
Db2 12 - Codes - SQLCODE -803 - IBM
When indexspace-name identifies a hash overflow index, the error occurred because a table with hash organization cannot have two rows with identical hash key values.
Resolving SQL Error Codes -803 and State 23505: A Guide
Jun 27, 2025 · These errors typically signify issues related to duplicate data entries, data integrity constraints, or key violations. In this comprehensive guide, we aim to delve deeply into these …
Database Engine events and errors (0 to 999) - SQL Server
Consult this SQL Server error code list (between 0 and 999) to find explanations for error messages for SQL Server database engine events.
DB2 SQL-Error: -803 when inserting into two related tables
Feb 1, 2014 · -803 means that you're trying to insert a row that violates the Unique Constraints of the table. If you're on DB2 Linux/Unix/Windows, you can take that number from SQLERRMC …
Common Database Errors & How to Fix Them
Nov 12, 2024 · To solve connection issues, you might need to adjust network settings, update database credentials, check server configurations, and make sure the server is up and running …
Appendix 4. Common Database Errors - Oracle
CLI0122E Program type out of range. A numeric or string range error occured.
BMXAA4211E - Database error number -803 has occurred when …
Sep 15, 2025 · Problem [ERROR] One or more values in the INSERT statement, UPDATE statement, or foreign key update caused by a DELETE statement are not valid because the …
Database Engine events and errors - SQL Server | Microsoft Learn
May 26, 2025 · Consult this MSSQL error code list to find explanations for error messages for SQL Server database engine events.
Resolving SQL Error Codes -803 and State 23505: A Guide
In this guide, you will learn about the core causes of these error codes, explore detailed resolution methodologies, examine real-world case studies, and gain actionable insights to proactively …
Update operation failed with SQLCODE=-803, how to troubleshoot?
Feb 9, 2019 · Any number greater than 200 is working fine. Find which unique-constraint you are breaking, and fix it. Better to use MERGE for cases like this. Side note: Your current query is …